The Ankler Sold Independence First
/The Ankler grew by saying what Hollywood trades could not, then waited for 2,000 free readers before charging for the one thing competitors could never copy: independence.
TL;DR: Richard Rushfield built The Ankler by publishing the Hollywood truths trade outlets were too entangled to print. He grew free for nine months, waited for 2,000 signups before opening the paywall, and sold the one benefit competitors could not bolt on later: independence.
FOR SALE: One newsletter nobody asked for.
Condition rough. Built in Mailchimp, Stripe, and whatever connective tissue could keep the payments from rolling under the refrigerator. Initial circulation: five friends.
Industry forecast: terrible idea.
I took ads by the word for fifteen years at sixty cents a word, and that price does something to a person. A widow selling a boat tells you the entire truth in eleven words or she does not tell you at all, and you can hear her dropping the adjectives live, one at a time, because they cost.
Rushfield had one word worth paying for and he did not spend it on quality, or access, or exclusive. He spent it on independent. It is the only word in that trade nobody else could afford to run.
Price today: more than the people laughing in 2016 would enjoy discussing.
Claire Zulkey’s account of The Ankler’s growth counts the scale now: more than a dozen newsletters, 2024 revenue pacing near $10 million. The useful part happened before any of that. Rushfield found something the established trades could not sell because their relationships made the merchandise impossible to stock.
The Ankler sold independence before it sold subscriptions
The Ankler sold editorial independence to Hollywood insiders who felt the existing coverage had stopped matching the world they worked in.
Independence was the product. Rushfield wrote down what people already knew and could not find in the trades, especially skepticism toward Netflix boosterism and industry claims the trade press repeated on faith.
“Independent” has become a label anybody can print on a tote bag. Readers pay for the consequence: the sentence that advertiser dependence or corporate caution kept out of every other publication.
The early sends were tiny: five friends got the first issue, five more the next one.
Around forty, Rushfield let readers pass it along. No referral maze. No giveaway that filled the list with people who wanted an iPad and tolerated the newsletter.
Word of mouth works when the reader gains social value by forwarding the thing. “Somebody finally said it” travels better than “ten tips for entertainment executives.”
When did The Ankler ask readers to pay?
Rushfield kept the newsletter free for nine months and opened paid subscriptions after reaching 2,000 free signups.
Two thousand is the number I would have circled. Not because it is large, it is not, but because it is the point where a list stops being people who know you and starts being strangers who came anyway. I watched sellers cross that line on the classified desk for fifteen years. Under it you are asking friends for a favor. Over it you have a business, and the difference is not the count, it is who is in it.
He aimed to convert 10 percent and told Inbox Collective the newsletter beat that target. The threshold was small enough to measure with the naked eye and large enough to answer the only early question that mattered: did a specific group miss this when it failed to arrive?
The paywall followed evidence of appetite.
This is where creator advice gets drunk and begins singing about monetizing on day one. Early payment can validate a product. It can also starve a publication before readers know what keeps showing up in their inbox.
Free has to build the habit before payment can charge for breaking it.
The Ankler’s sequence proved the rule. Free issues established a dangerous little habit among insiders. Payment arrived after the habit had a constituency.
Rushfield was selling access to a continuing editorial nerve, the kind no feature list can price.
It left Substack when its ad needs outgrew the platform
The Ankler moved to its own platform in April 2026 because its advertising and operating needs had outgrown what the old setup offered.
Substack helped during an earlier stage. Rushfield joined in 2019, when the platform reduced the mechanical burden that had consumed about half his time in the Mailchimp era. Reach and convenience mattered.
Then the business developed needs the rented room could not meet.
Use rented reach while building the strength to leave it. A platform is useful right up to the morning its limits become your limits.
The new operation uses Passport, built by Automattic and Ben Thompson. The company described the move as part of building a durable business. That durability comes from owning more of the reader relationship and the platform itself.
Most newsletters will never need The Ankler’s stack. They still need the exit plan. Keep a clean subscriber export.
Own the domain. Know which part of revenue disappears if the host changes a rule on Thursday afternoon.
What can a small publisher steal from The Ankler?
The playbook underneath is renting the reach, owning the readers anyway. A small publisher can copy the sequence: identify the sentence compromised competitors cannot print, earn repeat attention around it, charge after appetite becomes visible, and own more infrastructure as the operation grows.
Do not copy the surface. Hollywood access and Janice Min’s operating experience cannot be bought off a swipe file. Neither can the timing of the newsletter boom.
Rushfield’s particular appetite for antagonizing his own prospects would kill a weaker product and has probably tried to kill this one more than once.
Copy the mechanism you can defend. The Ankler’s mechanism was a valuable editorial difference delivered with enough consistency that insiders passed it hand to hand.
The classifieds version is short:
WANTED: A truth your market discusses in private and cannot find in print. Must survive weekly use. Seller keeps platform, domain, and nerve.
Growth hacks need not apply.
Nine months of free is not patience. It is inventory. He was building the only asset a classifieds desk respects, which is a list of people who have already answered once.
Somewhere, five friends are opening the first issue. One of them has already decided who needs to see it next.
Frequently asked questions
How many free subscribers did The Ankler have before adding a paywall?
Richard Rushfield said he waited until the newsletter had 2,000 free signups. His paid-conversion target was 10 percent, and he reported exceeding it.
How large is Ankler Media now?
Inbox Collective reported in July 2026 that Ankler Media had about 20 employees and published more than a dozen newsletters, plus podcasts and events.
Does newsletter growth require staying on Substack?
No. Substack can reduce early technical work and aid discovery. The Ankler used it for years, then moved to an owned platform when the business required advertising technology and control beyond the old setup.
WANTED: readers who want the Substack truth before they build their whole operation on it. The Substack Field Guide: 2026 Edition covers what the platform does in 2026, free, before you find out the expensive way.
Get it in the store.
Comments are open to members. Sign up free →