LOADING THE FEED ▮
NICHE OF ONE
--:--
← The Feed

The Word "Catharsis" Has Stopped Meaning Anything. Diskonnekt Almost Rescues It.

/An Italian dark electro duo reaches for the most overused word in music press, then accidentally says something useful about rhythm, simplicity, and the difference between a concept and a record that earns it.

post to X email it
Halftone manga-style illustration of a recording console covered in rows of faders filling the foreground, monitor speakers mounted above it and an empty studio chair pushed back in a dim deserted control room.
// the everything pass All-Access The whole catalog, the members vault, and the back room where the operators talk shop. $37/yr →

Every promo cycle produces at least one artist who tells you, with total sincerity, that making music is catharsis. It’s the most reached-for word in the whole apparatus of the album cycle, right up there with “raw” and “authentic,” and by now it functions less like a claim and more like a password. Say it, the interviewer nods, everyone moves on to the influences question. Vincenzo, one half of the Italian dark electro duo Diskonnekt, said it too, in a new interview with SIDE-LINE: making music is “above all catharsis,” a “process of personal purification.” I have read that sentence, structurally identical, from a hundred acts who made records I don’t remember.

What I do remember, twenty minutes later, wasn’t the catharsis line. It was the two sentences past it, where he explains that his songs start from rhythm, and that the hardest thing in the whole process is being simple. That’s information you can actually use.

TL;DR: Diskonnekt’s new interview leans on the same “music is catharsis” language every artist reaches for, but underneath it sit two specific, testable claims: songs built rhythm-first from bass and drums, and the deliberate difficulty of stripping a dark electro track down to something direct. That part’s worth your time. The Plato’s-cave concept behind the new album “La Morte Del Sole” is more ambitious than the music has to earn, and I want to hear whether it does before I hand out credit for the idea.

Catharsis tells you almost nothing about a record

Almost nothing on its own, which is the point of the word. It’s a claim about the artist’s internal state at the moment of making the thing, and nobody outside that room can verify it or use it. Every genre has its version. Rock musicians call it exorcism. Rappers call it therapy they didn’t pay for. Dark electro and EBM acts, Diskonnekt’s actual lane, favor purification, which fits the genre’s whole aesthetic of scrubbing something toxic out of the body through repetition and volume. It sounds precise. It isn’t. You could swap the word into any press release from any decade and lose nothing, because it describes a feeling, not a method.

The reason this interview is worth flagging isn’t that Vincenzo said the word. It’s that he kept talking after he said it, and what came next was a method.

Why is “starting from rhythm” the more interesting claim?

Because it’s a decision with consequences, not a mood. Vincenzo says he builds compositions from bass and drums first, the elements that “drag everything forward and make the floor shake,” and he names The Prodigy as the reference point. That’s a specific lineage. Prodigy tracks are built to survive a room before they’re built to survive headphones, which means the low end has to do the emotional work that melody does in other genres. If Diskonnekt is actually working that way, and not just naming an influence for flavor, you’d expect the bass and drum programming to carry more of the tension than the vocal or synth lines do. That’s a claim you can check against the record. “Catharsis” isn’t.

The harder admission, the one I trust more because it’s not flattering, is that simplicity is the difficult part. Anyone can layer a dark electro track until it’s dense enough to hide its own weaknesses. Stripping it down to something direct means every choice is exposed, and there’s nowhere for a mediocre hook to hide behind texture. Vincenzo calling that the greatest challenge tells me more about the actual work of making this record than every catharsis sentence combined, because it’s the kind of thing you only say if you’ve been burned by the alternative.

Does the Plato’s cave concept hold up, or is it just a good pitch?

This is where I get suspicious, and where the record has homework to do. “La Morte Del Sole,” their second album, is built around the impossibility of truth in a media-saturated society, with an explicit nod to Plato’s cave, plus touchstones like “The Matrix” and “Strange Days.” That’s a lot of philosophical scaffolding to hang on a dark electro record, and philosophical scaffolding is cheap. Any artist can cite Plato in an interview. Very few translate an epistemology problem into something that plays differently at 3 a.m. than a record that just says “the world is fake, man” and moves on.

The band’s name is doing some of the same work, supposedly symbolizing disconnection from harmful influences and a critique of digital-era control systems, which lines up neatly with the cave imagery. Too neatly, honestly. When the concept and the band name and the influences all point the same direction with this much tidiness, I start wondering whether the idea came before the music or got applied after, the way a lot of concept albums retrofit meaning onto tracks that were finished before anyone picked a theme. I’m not accusing them of that, only saying the interview alone can’t rule it out, and a 9/10 review from the outlet that also ran this interview isn’t the kind of independent confirmation that settles it either.

What would settle it is the record doing something a straightforward catharsis album wouldn’t. If the cave metaphor is real, the tracks should feel like they’re circling something they can’t quite name, restless in a specific way, rather than just heavy. If it’s decoration, the album will sound like every other well-made dark electro record with a smarter one-sheet. I haven’t heard it. I’m telling you what to listen for.

Frequently asked questions

Is “music is catharsis” always meaningless when an artist says it?

Not meaningless, just unverifiable and nearly universal, which makes it useless as a way to judge the work. Treat it as filler until the artist follows it with something specific, like a process detail or a named influence, that you could actually check against the finished record.

What should listeners pay attention to on “La Morte Del Sole” given the interview?

Whether the rhythm section is doing the emotional heavy lifting Vincenzo describes, since he names it as the foundation, and whether the record’s mood earns the Plato’s cave framing instead of just wearing it. A concept album should sound different from a record with the same concept bolted on afterward.

// comments
Full search on OneSearch: the network, the ring, and the open web →esc closes · ↑↓ move · ↵ opens